Invasive fungal infections after Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Date:
06/23/2026
Topics:
Citation:
Srisurapanont K, Meejun T, Manothummetha K, Li LX, Baddley JW, Schulz CA, Dioverti-Prono MV, Zhang SX, Avery RK, Kates OS, Permpalung N. Invasive fungal infections after Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Adv. 2026 Jun 23;10(12):4171-4182. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025019221. PMID: 41954633; PMCID: PMC13263698.
Abstract
The epidemiology of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) among patients receiving Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKIs) remains incompletely characterized. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 88 studies including 23 737 patients to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for IFIs in this population. Among 16 studies that applied the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium consensus definitions of IFIs, the pooled prevalence of proven/probable IFIs was 2.83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97-4.06), with the highest prevalence observed in patients with central nervous system lymphoma (9.02%). Aspergillosis was the most frequently reported IFI (1.76%), followed by pneumocystosis, candidiasis, and cryptococcosis. The risk factors significantly associated with proven/probable IFIs were concurrent corticosteroid use (odds ratio [OR], 5.03; 95% CI, 2.31-10.92) and ≥3 previous lines of therapy (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.54-6.88). Across clinical trials, the prevalence of fungal infections varied across BTKI agents, ranging from 2.50% with tirabrutinib, to 0.62% with pirtobrutinib. Data on antifungal and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis were limited and inconclusive. Among clinical trials that reported fungal infections as adverse events, the prevalence of IFI was the highest in patients treated with tirabrutinib (2.50%), followed by zanubrutinib (2.13%), ibrutinib (1.75%), acalabrutinib (1.31%), orelabrutinib (1.08%), and pirtobrutinib (0.62%). Although some findings suggest a potential benefit in selected patients, current evidence remains insufficient to support broad prophylaxis recommendations. These results underscore the need for individualized risk assessment and further research to inform prevention strategies.