In This Section      
Print This Page

Streamlined 'Military' Work Flow Means More Patient Appointments and Fewer Return Visits - 03/19/2015

Streamlined 'Military' Work Flow Means More Patient Appointments and Fewer Return Visits

Release Date: March 19, 2015
Joseph Herman and Shereef Elnahal
Joseph Herman and Shereef Elnahal

Fast Facts:

  • Work flow method examines tasks performed by physicians and nurses and identifies jobs that can be safely assigned to support staff.
  • Goal: identify critical tasks that, if missed or mishandled, would cost patients and physicians time or lead to avoidable symptoms and emergency room visits.
  • New method helps the clinic see more patients and reduces some redundant and time-consuming work.
  • It helped patients avoid return visits to the clinic and emergency room for preventable problems.
Both patients and physicians may benefit from a “work flow” system developed at military medical facilities and tested at a Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center clinic, according to results of an efficiency study.
 
The study evaluates a work flow method developed by the U.S. Air Force; Johns Hopkins researchers Shereef Elnahal, M.D., M.B.A. and Joseph Herman, M.D.; and consulting firm ProcessProxy Corp. Called the Military Acuity Model, the method examines tasks performed by physicians and nurses and identifies jobs that can be safely assigned to support staff.  For the study, the Johns Hopkins team applied the model to activities involving 139 patients seen by oncologists at the Cancer Center’s outpatient pancreatic cancer clinic. The goal, the researchers report, was to identify critical tasks that, if missed or mishandled, would cost patients and physicians time or lead to avoidable symptoms and emergency room visits.
 
“The fight against cancer is not only a biological one,” says Herman, the clinic’s director and associate professor of radiation oncology and molecular radiation sciences at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. “It also requires getting patients involved in treatment decisions and making care convenient, safe, and affordable for patients, and this is where I felt like we could improve.”
 
“The care we were providing was great, but we were limited by the number of patients we could see,” he adds.
 
The new work flow system, Herman says, helps the clinic see more patients and reduces some redundant and time-consuming work performed by oncologists. At the same time, the changes have helped patients avoid return visits to the clinic and emergency room for preventable problems.
 
Specifically, the clinic increased its daily patient volume by 31.4 percent, from an average of four patients per day to five patients per day. During the clinic’s busy season, from January to July, doctors in the clinic saw 10 patients per day with the new work flow in place, up from five patients per day.
 
In the 30 days after patients’ clinic visits, the percentage of patients who needed to call the clinic after their visits to discuss unresolved health issues decreased from 34 to 22 percent. The percentage of patients who had to go to the emergency room after their clinic visit also decreased, from 9.9 to 7.9 percent. The results of the evaluation are published in the March 2015 issue of the Physician Leadership Journal.
 
Led by Johns Hopkins radiation oncology resident Elnahal, Herman and his colleagues identified six critical tasks that were reallocated to support staff, including the collection of pain assessment scores the morning of the clinic, assigning patients to specific doctors based on the patients’ stage and comorbidities, and ensuring patients came to the clinic with the most up-to-date medical imaging. “This allowed physicians to make treatment decisions faster and more confidently on the day of the clinic, affording them more time to address patients’ symptoms and concerns,” says Elnahal.
 
The method used an existing two-member support team who managed these tasks, in addition to addressing social risk factors such as substance abuse and insurance barriers.
 
“We are learning everything we can about patients before they walk in our door,” Herman says. “In the past, we would see patients in our clinic, look at their records and then figure out what they need. It makes much more sense to properly triage people in advance, and that’s what Dr. Elnahal’s system does so well.”
 
Having an efficient system in place keeps clinical staff members from working frantically to schedule tests or locate records in a short amount of time, preventing them from becoming overwhelmed and missing things, Elnahal says. 
 
Other Kimmel Cancer Center researchers involved in the study include Peter Pronovost, Timothy Pawlik, Shalini Moningi, Aaron Wild, Avani Dholakia, Mary Hodgin, Katherine Fan and Peng Huang.
 
###