Search the Health Library
Get the facts on diseases, conditions, tests and procedures.
I Want To...
I Want To...
Find Research Faculty
Enter the last name, specialty or keyword for your search below.
School of Medicine
Healthy Eaters: Ignore Glycemic Index - 12/16/2014
Healthy Eaters: Ignore Glycemic Index
Clinical trial shows no beneficial effects on key measures of heart disease and diabetes risk
Release Date: December 16, 2014
Lawrence J. Appel, M.D., Ph.D.
Credit: Johns Hopkins Medicine
- People eating a heart-healthy diet get no reduction in blood pressure or “bad” LDL cholesterol and no better insulin response when they choose low glycemic index foods.
- Researchers say there is no need to worry about high versus low glycemic index foods when choosing a diet for heart health and reduced diabetes risk.
- Other studies have not produced strong evidence that low glycemic foods help people lose weight or keep it off.
Good news for people who are already following a diet rich in fruits, vegetables and whole grains, and low in sweets: New research suggests these heart-healthy eaters don’t need to worry about choosing low glycemic index foods to lower the risk of diabetes and heart disease. Though the study was not designed to test the effects of low glycemic index foods on weight control, its lead researchers looked at studies that did focus on weight and found no clear proof of a benefit.
The glycemic index is a measure of how quickly foods containing carbohydrates, such as fruits, cereals and baked goods, raise glucose levels in the bloodstream. Conventional wisdom says that high glycemic index foods like bananas and pasta are “bad” for heart health and may increase diabetes risk. But in a clinical trial reported Dec. 17 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, researchers at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Harvard Medical School found little evidence to support these claims.
Study volunteers followed carefully planned diets high or low in carbohydrates and with high or low glycemic index scores. Tests tracked the volunteers’ blood pressure, cholesterol levels and sensitivity to insulin at the beginning and end of each diet. The results showed little difference between high and low glycemic index foods, says study co-director Lawrence J. Appel, M.D., M.P.H., a professor of medicine and director of the Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research at Johns Hopkins Medicine.
“We were really surprised,” Appel says. “We did not detect any clear benefit of the low glycemic index diets on the major risk factors for heart disease, and we found no evidence of benefit for diabetes prevention.”
The authors looked closely at other studies focusing on the use of low glycemic index foods in weight control. “The evidence has been inconsistent that low glycemic foods help people lose more weight or keep it off,” Appel says. “In looking at the causes of obesity and ways to combat it, a narrow focus on the glycemic index seems to be unwarranted.”
Several popular diets recommend choosing carbohydrates that score low on the glycemic index, but that’s not always easy. Only laboratory tests can determine a food’s glycemic index, and the results can be unexpected: Apples score low, but cantaloupe scores high.
Appel and study co-director Frank M. Sacks, M.D., a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, wanted to find out whether foods’ glycemic index matters to heart health and diabetes prevention. They recruited 163 volunteers from Baltimore and Boston — all of whom were overweight and had above normal blood pressure — and randomly assigned them to follow one of four diets. Each diet contained the same number of calories, but those calories came from foods that were either high or low in carbohydrates, and also either high or low on the glycemic index. The volunteers ate the day’s main meal at a research center and took home their next two meals.
After five weeks on their assigned diets, the volunteers switched to a different one. Researchers tested the volunteers’ blood pressure; sensitivity to insulin; and levels of “good” high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, “bad” low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides — fat molecules, or lipids, that play a role in heart health. The low glycemic index diets did not lower blood pressure or LDL cholesterol, and they did not improve insulin resistance.
Women made up 51 percent of the study’s volunteers, and African-Americans made up 52 percent, so the results have broad relevance, says Appel, who offers simple advice for anyone overwhelmed by conflicting messages about diet and health.
“Get back to the basics that most people already know,” he says. “Don’t drink sugar-sweetened drinks. Try to eat fruits, vegetables and whole grains. Try to avoid sweets, salt, and foods high in saturated and trans fats. People who follow these principles will reap the benefits.”
Appel and Sacks led three earlier clinical trials that tested ways to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes, providing volunteers with carefully designed diets and measuring the effects on key health indicators. Their work established the health benefits of the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) and OmniHeart Mediterranean-style diets.
Other authors on the paper are Vincent Carey, Trisha Copeland and Benjamin Harshfield of Harvard Medical School; Edgar R. Miller III, Jeanne Charleston, Phyllis McCarron and Karen White of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Nancy Laranjo, Janis Swain and Karen Yee of Brigham and Women’s Hospital; and Cheryl Anderson of the University of California, San Diego.
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (grant number 5R01HL084568), the National Center for Research Resources (grant numbers 1 UL1 RR0275758-04 and M01-02635) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (grant number 8UL1 TR000170-05).