Selected Publications
Heitmiller RF, Gruber PJ, Swier P, Singh N. Long-segment substernal jejunal esophageal replacement with internal mammary vascular augmentation. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2000;(13), 240-242.
Nahabedian MY, Dooley W, Singh N, Manson P. Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: the role of muscle preservation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Jan. 2002; Vol. 109 No. 1, 91-101.
Tu AT, Girotto JA, Singh N, Dufresne CR, Robertson BC, Seyfer AE, Manson PN, Iliff N. Facial fractures from dog bite injuries. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Apr. 2002;Vol.109 No. 4, 1259-1265.
Singh N, Robertson BC, Dellon A Lee. Use of an innervated tongue flap to rehabilitate the tongue after hypoglossal to facial nerve transfer. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Jun 2002; Vol. 109 No. 7, 2439-2442.
Chevray PM, Singh NK. Abdominal wall reconstruction with the free tensor fascia lata myofasciocutaneous flap using intraperitoneal gastroepiploic recipient vessels. Annals of Plastic Surgery. July 2003;51(1):97-102.
Girotto JA, Chiaramonte M, Menon G, Singh NK, Tufaro AP, Nahabedian M, Goldberg NH, Manson PN. Recalcitrant abdominal wall hernias: long-term superiority of autologous tissue repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jul;112(1):106-14.
Silverman RP, Singh NK, Li, EN, Disa, JJ, Girotto JA, Slezak, S, Goldberg NH. Restoring abdominal wall integrity in contaminated tissue-deficient wounds using autologous fasica grafts. Plast and Reconstructive Surgery. 2004 Feb; 113(2): 673-5.
Nahabedian MY, Singh NK, Deune EG, Silverman RP, Tufaro AP. Recipient vessel analysis for microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck. Annals of Plastic Surgery. In Press.
Taghva, A, Rodriguez, ED, Silverman, RP, Singh, NK, Tufaro,AP. The Buccal Fat Pad for periorbital reconstruction: a cadaver dissection and report of two cases. Plast and Reconstructive Surgery. In Press.
Patient Ratings & Comments
The Patient Rating score is an average of all responses to physician related questions on the national CG-CAHPS Medical Practice patient experience survey through Press Ganey. Responses are measured on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the best score. Comments are also gathered from our CG-CAHPS Medical Practice Survey through Press Ganey and displayed in their entirety. Patients are de-identified for confidentiality and patient privacy.