I Want To...
I Want To...
Find Research Faculty
Enter the last name, specialty or keyword for your search below.
School of Medicine
I Want to...
Share this page: More
Home > Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences > About Us > Publications > Newsletter > > 2008 - Winter Issue
A Double Take on Withdrawal
News from the Johns Hopkins Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
A side-by-side look at marijuana and nicotine withdrawal underscores the need to consider both in the clinic.
Myths about marijuana use are plentiful and hard to squelch: It’s an innocuous, friendly little drug; it isn’t addictive and is easy for any user to quit; there’s little interplay between it and other illicit drug use. Such ideas have likely been around as long as the drug itself, perhaps, in part, because hard research has been relatively scarce.
But in the past decade, a small cluster of scientists has made marijuana studies a specialty, describing use of the drug and the range of its effects and, more recently, pinning it down as an addictive substance with a genuine withdrawal syndrome. One of the group, Hopkins behavioral pharmacologist Ryan Vandrey, Ph.D., began marijuana research as a graduate student at the University of Vermont, home of some early definitive work. As the evidence mounts, he and colleagues are hoping to change perceptions of marijuana as harmless for everyone. “Recent research suggests as many as one in 10 who try the drug develop problems tied either to its use or to quitting it,” he says. “We need better ways to treat those seeking help.”
Vandrey’s latest work, reported in the January issue of Drug and Alcohol Dependence, aims to extend his earlier research on marijuana withdrawal by comparing it to that of a drug already well understood in the lab and by the man in the street—nicotine. “Ultimately, we hope to clarify withdrawal’s role in the subset of teen and adult users who find abstinence so difficult,” says Vandrey. “If it turns out to be clinically important—as our results suggest—we’ll have a therapeutic target.”
Marijuana withdrawal is marked by increased anger and aggression, anxiety, depressed mood, irritability, restlessness, insomnia, strange dreams and decreased appetite. Less commonly, there are headaches, physical tension, sweating, stomach pain and general malaise. “The typical effects are probably the ones most related to relapse in patients,” says Vandrey. They’re common, he adds, to all drugs of abuse.
In the new study, Vandrey and colleagues recruited heavy users of tobacco and marijuana. Each followed a schedule that involved usual use alternating with periods of “cold turkey” abstinence from either drug as well as both at the same time. All filled out daily surveys of marijuana withdrawal and nicotine withdrawal. “Our earlier studies on withdrawal in marijuana smokers and withdrawal in tobacco smokers showed that what they go through is fairly similar,” says Vandrey.
Because comparing different people introduces an element of apples versus oranges, however, the new study’s look at same-person withdrawals of both substances is stronger scientifically. It also sheds light on simultaneous withdrawal—the first such study of its kind. “This is important,” Vandrey says, “because roughly half of heavy marijuana users are also tobacco addicted. And among heavy smokers, about 9 percent have a daily marijuana habit.”
In the end, withdrawal appeared similar in intensity and quality from all the angles in the study. Data from quitting both marijuana and nicotine reflect an odd turn, though: Half of participants reported it was easier to quit both substances at once; the others found it harder. While that needs looking into, Vandrey says, it at least suggests drug treatment programs should address clients’ simultaneous tobacco use, something rarely done today.
For information: 410-550-4036.