News Media Home | Hopkins Medicine Home
September 19, 2001
MEDIA CONTACT: Joanna Downer
PHONE: 410-614-5105
E-MAIL: jdowner1@jhmi.edu
Hopkins Scientist Evaluates Latest Findings On The Ancestry of Whales
From Moby Dick to Shamu, whales have long fascinated humans. Their remarkable
status as ocean-dwelling mammals, along with dolphins and porpoises, at once
makes them related to us and yet inconceivably different from us. Thus their
evolution -- the developmental steps required to leave solid ground for a life
in the water -- has long fascinated scientists, including Kenneth Rose of the
Program for Functional Anatomy and Evolution at the Johns Hopkins School of
Medicine.
In the September 21 issue of the journal Science, Rose provides outside perspective on a report in the same issue that fills an important gap in scientists' understanding of whale evolution. The report by others documents new fossils of very primitive whales that were found in Pakistan.
The new fossils, says Rose, have well-developed limbs and are the first to
have well-enough preserved ankle bones to allow scientists to change their conclusions
about which animals are the closest relatives of these 50 million-year-old primitive
whales. The importance of this finding, and a similar report about even older
fossils in the September 20 issue of Nature, is that it unifies the scientific
perspective on whale evolution, says Rose. "What's most important about
these new fossils is that they contain well-preserved ankles, the most important
region morphologically for establishing evolutionary relationships as early
whales were in the process of becoming aquatic," explains Rose. "Previously,
only fragments have been known of these species, and the few ankle bones that
some had identified were not widely accepted among scientists because of the
condition of the fossils and their lack of direct association with whale skulls."
There are two main ways scientists determine evolutionary relationships among
various species, he explains. Some scientists consider physical characteristics
of specimens -- the morphology -- and look for similarities or differences,
the presence and relative complexity of various systems, and other measures
that help create connections in the evolutionary tree. In the last two decades,
others have focused on molecular examinations of species, determining the extent
to which two species' genetic information share common features, through studying
both nuclear DNA and DNA found in tiny cellular structures called mitochondria.
Until the new fossils were found, morphology and genetics gave different answers
to the question of who are whales' closest land-dwelling relatives, thanks in
part to the limited information about the primitive whales' ankles, says Rose.
Morphologic analysis of the fossil ankles, which Rose conducted independently
for his perspective article, shows that these primitive whales (referred to
scientifically as the cetaceans) are closely related to "even-toed ungulates"
such as sheep, pigs, cows, camels, deer and hippos (an evolutionary order known
as the artiodactyls).
"There has been no question about whales' relationship to hoofed mammals,
the question was to which group of hoofed mammals," says Rose. "Prior
to having the ankle information, morphologically, early whales appeared to be
the sister group of mesonychians -- an extinct group of land-dwelling carnivores.
The new fossils provide compelling evidence that whales are not just related
to, but descended from, artiodactyls rather than mesonychians, bringing the
morphological evidence into accord with the molecular data."
While the agreement of morphology with molecular analysis is welcome and affirmative
of both methodologies, Rose cautions that there are problems created by the
conclusions. Among the outstanding conundrums: The close relationship between
cetaceans and hippos appears to require the break-up of groups that have been
thought for years to be closely related, he says.
Rose has published in the past on comparative anatomy of both artiodactyls and mesonychians, but his current work focuses on comparative and functional anatomy of fossils and existing animals to help interpret the probable behavior of extinct mammals. He was invited by the editors of Science to write the perspective on the new fossil discoveries.
Related Web sites:
Science: http://www.sciencemag.org
The Program for Functional Anatomy and Evolution at Johns Hopkins School of
Medicine: http://www.med.jhu.edu/FAE/fae.html
Nature: http://www.nature.com