Search the Health Library
Get the facts on diseases, conditions, tests and procedures.
I Want To...
I Want To...
Find Research Faculty
Enter the last name, specialty or keyword for your search below.
School of Medicine
I Want to...
Pediatric Heart News - A Better Way to Guide Defibrillator Placement in Children
Pediatric Heart News Winter 2014
A Better Way to Guide Defibrillator Placement in Children
Date: December 16, 2013
Natalia Trayanova, left, and Jane Crosson say the model “is like having a virtual electrophysiology lab where we can predict best outcomes before we even touch the patient.
The small size and abnormal anatomy of children born with heart defects often mean that a defibrillator must be placed entirely outside the heart. Johns Hopkins researchers, however, report* that it may be possible to use a virtual 3-D heart model that analyzes a child’s unique anatomy and pinpoints the best location for the device before it is implanted.
“Pediatric cardiologists have long sought a way to optimize device placement in this group of cardiac patients,” says Johns Hopkins biomedical engineer Natalia Trayanova, “and we believe that our model is a critical first step toward bringing computational analysis to the pediatric cardiology clinic.”
To build the model, the team began with low-resolution MRI heart scans of a child born with tricuspid valve atresia who’d had a modified Blalock–Taussig shunt, bilateral bidirectional Glenn shunts and a Fontan procedure using an extracardiac conduit. Based on these images, investigators developed a 3-D computer model that allowed them to simulate ventricular fibrillation and then predict how effectively the defibrillator would terminate the arrhythmia when located in each one of 11 positions around the heart. The model revealed that two particular positions rendered therapy optimal.
A particular advantage of the model is that the team used digital representations of the heart’s subcellular, cellular, muscular and connective structures—from ions and cardiac proteins to muscle fiber and tissue—and also included the bones, fat and lungs that surround the heart.
“Heart function is astounding in its complexity and person-to-person variability,” Trayanova says, “and subtle shifts in how one protein interacts with another may have profound consequences on pumping and electric function. We wanted to capture that level of specificity to ensure predictive accuracy.”
Less-than-precisely positioned defibrillators can fire unnecessarily or, worse, fail to fire when needed to shock a child’s heart back into normal rhythm. In addition, devices that are not positioned well can deliver ultra-strong, painful jolts that can damage heart cells and increase risk of death.
“These are lifesaving devices,” says Johns Hopkins pediatric cardiologist and arrhythmia specialist Jane Crosson, a member of the study team. “But they can feel like a horse kick to the chest and really traumatize children.”
In their study, the researchers considered the best configuration to be the placement that exhibited the lowest defibrillation and cardioversion thresholds. If further studies show the model has value in patients, it could spare many children with heart disease from repeat procedures that are sometimes needed to reposition the device.
* Rantner LJ, Vadakkumpadan F, Spevak PJ, Crosson JE, Trayanova, NA. Placement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in paediatric and congenital heart defect patients: a pipeline for model generation and simulation prediction of optimal configurations. J Physiol 2013;591:4321–4334.
The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health under grant number R01HL103428.