Skip Navigation
 
 
 
 
 
Print This Page
Share this page: More
 

Hopkins Medicine Magazine - A Green Light for Lymphatic Mapping

Hopkins Medicine Winter 2013

A Green Light for Lymphatic Mapping

Date: February 1, 2013


Suspicious nodes pop up like neon signs, says Tanner.
Suspicious nodes pop up like neon signs, says Tanner.

For most women with uterine or cervical cancer, the prognosis is good, thanks to early detection: The majority of these women are postmenopausal, and the first symptom of uterine cancer is vaginal bleeding—a discovery that usually prompts a call to a gynecologist. Still, cancer cells can’t be trusted, and nothing concerns a gynecologic oncology surgeon more, says Edward Tanner, than having a patient apparently at low risk for recurrence following hysterectomy and lymph node removal who still develops more disease later.

After diagnosis, the standard laparoscopic approach is to remove the uterus and, in many cases, lymph nodes in the pelvis. In the past few years, some surgeons have attempted to identify the lymph nodes at highest risk for disease by injecting blue dye and/or radiocolloid into the cervix at the start of the procedure. This technique, called sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping, is useful but has some drawbacks. The blue dye often stains normal tissue, says Tanner, making it difficult to identify troubling areas with precision.

Fortunately, he says, advanced robotic surgery with multispectral fluorescent imaging—typically favored in other specialties like urology and colorectal surgery—is now available at Hopkins Hospital for gyn procedures. With its indocyanine green (ICG) dye, which can only be used with the new camera technology, he explains, suspicious nodes pop up like neon signs, “and that gives us more peace of mind.”

Tanner also cites the advantages of real-time lymphatic mapping, and avoidance of radioactivity. With this novel form of mapping, he says, surgeons can direct the pathologist to the lymph node most likely to contain disease that has spread beyond the uterus.

“I’ve seen some patients in which the only positive lymph node was a tiny metastasis in the SLN,” says Tanner. “We can’t know whether this node would have been missed with a more conventional LN analysis, but I’ve also seen cases where patients have had a complete LN dissection that was all negative and the patient then had a recurrence in the area of the LNs. I suspect that we just didn’t find it because we didn’t know which of the 20 to 50 LNs to focus our efforts on.”

Over the course of the 150-plus procedures Tanner has performed, he’s rarely needed to convert to an open incision. “The recovery time is incredibly fast, and pain levels are manageable,” he says. “Some women return to their jobs in as few as two weeks.”   

The long-term hope, Tanner says, “is that with greater visualization and experience with this technique, we may one day be able to omit complete lymph node dissection, which can cause lymphedema in the legs.” Judy F. Minkove

Related Content
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

© The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy and Disclaimer