|
|
 |
The Marvels of Telomerase
By Rebecca Skloot
Meet Carol Greider,
a geneticist who does handstands on horseback, competes in triathlons
and made what may prove to be one of the most significant finding in modern
biology.
hen
Carol Greider was growing up in Davis, California, they called her The
Flier. Her preferred amusement at that point was a sport called vaulting—doing
handstands on the back of a speeding horse. As a teenager, she got to
be quite an expert at soaring through the air, arms and legs outstretched,
as she balanced on the shoulders of two friends, and the horse beneath
them cantered in smooth circles.

Greider examines
the radioactive markers that point the way to telomerase. |
Those
who know Greider, now a 39-year-old
professor of molecular biology and
genetics at Hopkins, are never surprised
when they find out she vaulted competitively.
“That is so Carol,” they say—“fast-paced,
fun and daring.” Greider, who talks
so quickly she often soundslikethis,
is famous for never taking the slow
and easy route. That goes for her
science, too. In the mid-’80s, when
she was still working toward her
Ph.D. in molecular biology at UC
Berkeley, she took on a project
most graduate students would have
gone out of their way to avoid and
ended up making a discovery that
has changed her field.
Working
in the lab of molecular biologist Elizabeth Blackburn, Greider became
interested in telomeres—specialized regions of DNA that protect and stabilize
the tips of chromosomes. Researchers knew that a small section of telomeres
wasn’t copied as cells divided and chromosomes were replicated. This should
have left the resulting cells with shorter telomeres, but it didn’t. Telomeres
always maintained their length, and Blackburn wanted to know how. She
had a hunch it was because of a yet-undiscovered enzyme that balanced
each telomere shortening with a subsequent elongation (by creating telomeric
DNA and attaching it to the ends of chromosomes). Blackburn wanted to
find that enzyme, but she knew it would be tough. She therefore was impressed
when Greider announced she wanted to take on the search.
“I
had reason to think the enzyme existed,” remembers Blackburn, now a professor
of biochemistry and biophysics at UC San Francisco. “But I had tenure,
so I felt brave [enough to persist with the search]. For a student to
want to get involved in this project was almost unheard of. Students want
to do safe things, and this was not safe. It could have completely crashed
and burned. But Carol had a sense of adventure, she said, ‘Hah, this is
interesting, I want to do it.’ And she did.”
On Christmas Day 1984, working alone in her Berkeley laboratory, Greider
pulled an X-ray film from the developer and felt a rush of adrenalin.
She had been searching for the enzyme with autoradiography, a process
that uses radioactive markers to find the makeup and location of molecules
within cells. There, on the X-ray film, was the exact pattern researchers
had anticipated they would see when they found the enzyme. “Okay,” Greider
remembers saying to herself, “don’t get excited. It could be an artifact,
it could be many things besides what we’re looking for.” But after countless
experiments to rule out other possibilities, it was clear that Carol Greider
had indeed found the elusive enzyme. That night, she ran home, cranked
up Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the USA,” and “rocked out” in celebration.
Greider and her lab group dubbed the enzyme “telomerase.”
“It
was a fundamental discovery, right
up there with figuring out how DNA
is replicated and how cells divide,”
says Lea Harrington, an assistant
professor of medical biophysics
at the University of Toronto. “People
had been asking how organisms maintain
the genetic material at the ends
of their chromosomes since the ’70s.
Telomerase was the answer.”
With
Greider’s discovery, research on telomeres and telomerase exploded. Greider
finished her Ph.D. in 1988 and sped off to take a postdoctoral fellowship
at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island so quickly she never picked
up her diploma. She’d been recruited to the famous research institute
by the director, Nobel laureate James Watson, co-discoverer of the double
helix.
Over
the next six years, working with a colleague named Cal Harley, Greider
came to understand that the role of telomerase in the human body was even
more profound than anyone had surmised. The two demonstrated that telomeres
shorten progressively in normal cells until the cells either die or enter
senescence, a state in which they are alive but not dividing. “They’re
just hanging out in culture,” as Greider puts it. She and Harley conjectured
that the telomerase enzyme had been active prenatally but had turned off
at some point before birth. This they went on to verify in mice. By then,
Greider had been promoted twice and was a full-fledged investigator at
Cold Spring.
By
the mid-’90s, Greider had begun thinking about cancer cells—they divide
far more often than average cells. If the telomeres in cancer cells shortened
with each division, as they do in other cells, cancerous cells should
die in the same way. But they don’t. Greider and Harley hypothesized that
telomerase might somehow be reactivated in cancer cells, allowing them
to go on lengthening their telomeres and dividing indefinitely. The two
researchers began to imagine a treatment for cancer in which telomerase
could be inhibited long enough to wipe out the telomeres in the malignant
cells. This would trigger death in the cancer cells but not in normal
ones with their longer telomeres. No one took the idea seriously.
As
it turns out, Greider and Harley were right. More than 90 percent of cancer
cells do reactivate their telomerase. Harley demonstrated this a few years
after he and Greider had surmised it, and, suddenly, everyone began paying
attention to the two researchers’ cancer therapy idea. Greider took one
more step in preparation for work on a search for a cancer treatment involving
telomerase. She wanted to determine that depriving the body of the enzyme
for a limited period of time wouldn’t be harmful. By early 1996, she had
created a mouse model in which she’d genetically “knocked out” the telomerase
enzyme. The mouse showed no adverse effects.
That
winter while at work in her lab, Greider took a telephone call and found
Tom Kelly, chairman of Molecular Biology and Genetics at Johns Hopkins,
on the other end. He was calling to offer her an associate professorship
in his department. For Greider it was the dream job. Her husband, Nathaniel
Comfort, had just finished a Ph.D. in history and accepted a faculty position
in the history of science at George Washington University. The couple
was looking hard for a post for Carol in the D.C. area. Not only was Johns
Hopkins less than an hour away, it was also the top-ranked department
in her field. She joined the faculty here in July 1997.
Since
then, as her telomerase research has expanded, Greider’s science has grown
more complex. In 1999, she was promoted to professor. In the meantime,
she’s traded her passion for vaulting for competing in the occasional
triathlon. The sport requires superb abilities in swimming, biking and
running. “Vaulting is just a little different from gymnastics,” she explains.
“And being a triathlete is just a little different from running. So far,
I’ve only done four triathlons. Maybe a few more … I don’t know.”
This
tendency toward understatement accentuates much of what Greider does.
But it’s not for lack of conviction. She isn’t soft-spoken; she’s careful-spoken.
She’s learned from experience. Soon after she and Cal Harley announced
the earliest findings in telomerase research, a reporter pre-empted publication
of their work by publishing part of the data. She swore she’d never talk
to another member of the press, but Jim Watson convinced her to soften
her stance. The results have been mixed.
On
the good side, Greider met her husband
Nathaniel, in his former career
as a science writer for the public
affairs office at Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory when he called to interview
her in 1992. “I insisted he come
to my office instead of doing the
interview over the phone,” she says,
“and when he walked through the
door I said, Oh! I’m glad I insisted.”
They married the next year. She’s
also found herself in everything
from The New Yorker
to Esquire,
where she shared pages with the
likes of Leonardo DiCaprio as one
of the 21 most important people
for the 21st century. “Me and Leo,”
she says with her fingers crossed,
“we’re like this.”
 |
 |
| Greider,
competing in the Bud Light triathlon. |
On
the down side, reporters are fond
of referring to telomerase as the
immortality enzyme and claiming
that researchers like Greider have
found the cellular fountain of youth.
After publication of her work showing
that telomere length helped determine
when a cell enters senescence, “suddenly
cellular senescence turned into
cellular aging,” Greider explains.
“Then pretty soon, the ‘cellular’
got dropped, and people were writing
that telomere length determines
the lifespan of the organism, which
we never said.”
Sitting
at a small round table in her office, flipping through articles about
her work that she’s collected through the years, Greider bounces to the
edge of her chair and lets out an I-can’t-believe-this sort of shriek
as she waves a Time
magazine in the air. A seductive woman with perfectly unwrinkled skin
stares from its cover above the headline “Forever Young.”
“Don’t
believe it!” Greider yells. “If you put telomerase back in normal cells
in culture, you can extend the lifespan of the cells, but extending cell
life has nothing to do with the lifespan of an organism.”
Her
voice gets faster as she talks. “Journalists don’t call me as much anymore.
I think they’re tired of hearing me say, ‘Look guys, the aging thing is
not that big a deal.’ On the cancer side I still say there’s great hope
for treatments, but telomerase is definitely not going to change human
longevity.”
As
she speaks, Greider twirls a pen
between her middle and ring finger,
which is stacked with three rings.
Her husband gave them all to her,
one for their wedding, and one for
the birth of each of their two children—Charles,
4, and Gwendolyn, 1. Greider considered
putting the rings for the children
on a separate hand, but her husband,
Nathaniel insisted she keep the
family together. “I can’t have any
more kids,” Greider says, “because
my finger won’t fit any more rings.
But if I do, I’ll just get used
to not bending my finger.”
Greider
approaches her family with the same gusto she brings to the lab. She spends
all her free time with Nathaniel and the children. When her research calls
her to a conference, the family goes along. After Gwendolyn was born,
she quickly became known as the woman who gave riveting talks, zoomed
from the podium to nurse her child between sessions, then rushed back
for more science while her husband played nearby with the kids. Several
female colleagues admit they’re in awe of the way Greider pulls off being
both a mother and a prolific scientist. She responds: “Nathaniel is why
it’s possible for me to do this crazy balancing act.”
For
Greider, life is all about fun, and that includes digging into telomerase
biology. For her fellow researchers, simply being in the lab with her
is fun. With her long brown hair bouncing behind her, she’ll charge through
the lab in her stretch pants, letting out a laugh as she moves from bench
to bench. Her blue eyes sparkle with the kind of mischief that has defined
her since childhood. She’s still fond of snowball fights and practical
jokes, and is known for announcing suddenly to the entire lab, “Okay,
time for a human pyramid.” She’ll then climb to the top of a stack of
students, technicians and postdocs, strike a pose reminiscent of her days
as a flier atop running horses and remind them all quite seriously that
she wouldn’t be where she is without their support.
THE WHITE
HOUSE CALLED
Carol
Greider was sound asleep in an Australian hotel room when her Hopkins
office called and said the White House wanted her resume. “What should
I do?” her assistant asked.
“I guess you
give it to them,” Greider said, “what else can you do when the
White House asks for something?”
Greider
had been chosen to be a member of the National Bioethics Advisory
Committee, a team of experts in law, bioethics, science, and medicine
drawn together from top institutions around the country. The committee,
led by Harold Shapiro, president of Princeton University, advises
the president and governmental agencies about ethical issues relating
to science.
In
recent years, NBAC has produced reports on ethical or policy-guidance
issues related to research involving human biological materials,
human stem cells and individuals with mental disorders. These reports
delve into the science and ethics behind each topic, offer principles
by which ethical conduct should be governed, and make recommendations
as to how governmental agencies should proceed in light of these
issues. Though the committee meets regularly, news of big developments,
like Dolly the cloned sheep, often means that at a moment’s notice,
Greider’s phone can ring calling her to Washington for another phase
of intense deliberations.
|
Meanwhile,
if you ask telomerase researchers where they’d be without Greider’s work,
they appear dumbfounded. “Well,” says Titia de Lange, professor of cell
biology and genetics at the Rockefeller University, “the discovery of
telomerase …” She pauses for several moments, then says, “I can’t even
begin to describe what an impact it’s had. In the early ’80s when they
proposed it, I didn’t believe it was possible. When Carol actually found
telomerase, it was an absolutely stunning discovery. As the work continues,
telomerase just becomes more and more interesting, and more and more important.”
The
telomerase-cancer connection stirs excitement among scientists. From what
Greider and others have learned, it now seems that a cancer therapy soon
might be possible that doesn’t kill all cells, like many chemotherapies,
but targets only cancer cells. The result would mean getting rid of the
debilitating side effects of chemotherapy.
“Carol’s
work has established that if you remove telomerase, it’s not lethal to
animals,” says Toronto’s Lea Harrington. “Her mice that lack telomerase
are viable and normal for several generations, and there’s evidence that
this lack of telomerase is detrimental to cancer cells. This has turned
into a kind of Holy Grail for cancer therapy.”
But
Greider is leaving the therapeutic research to the pharmaceutical companies.
She herself is pursuing the questions that keep her awake at night, the
real cell biological questions, the fun stuff, like what happens when
you lose telomere function?
Carol
Greider will give the last of the esteemed Dean’s Lectures of this academic
year on Monday, May 14.
|