Really long fingers. That’s the first thing everyone
in the delivery room noticed when Blake Althaus was born
in November 2002. But if his mom, Anita, had dreams of
Blake as a concert pianist, they quickly dissipated. “Is
this curve in his spine normal?” she asked her
pediatrician. It wasn’t. Nor was the leaky heart
valve. Nor the dislocated eye lenses. Nor the floppy
muscle tone.
By the time Blake was 2 months old, Anita and Joe
Althaus found themselves facing a geneticist who delivered
chilling news: Blake had a particularly severe and
rapidly progressive form of Marfan syndrome and would
die soon. They’d be lucky if he reached age 2.
Anita, a former social worker with the child protection
division in Hennepin County, Minnesota, focused the
skills she’d learned on the job on the survival
of her son. “I’m good at networking,” she
boasts. And tenacious. Tearing through the Internet
to learn about the strange condition that now controlled
her life, she saw lists of people claimed as one of
their own by the National Marfan Society—names
ranging from Abraham Lincoln to Rent playwright Jonathan
Larson. She came across stories about tall, lanky basketball
players collapsing on the court and dying. Stories
about families with a history of the condition. But
there was no such history in her family or Joe’s.
What could any of these cases have to do with their
infant son?
As she doggedly continued her search, Anita learned
that in the athletes, a defect in the body’s
connective tissue—the protein glue that literally
holds the body’s cells together—slowly
stretched and weakened the aorta, the major artery
carrying blood from the heart, until it suddenly ruptured
during exertion. In babies born with the rare, severe
form of Marfan syndrome (MFS), the process is so accelerated
they often die within a few years, their aorta ballooning
for no apparent reason. The mutation in these cases
is spontaneous, not inherited. These children don’t
live long enough to reproduce and launch a hereditary
line. The geneticist wasn’t exaggerating.
Desperately searching online for physicians
who treat Marfan syndrome, Anita found many who care
for adults with the problem. But when it came to children,
the name that came up over and over again was Harry
Dietz.
She had no way of knowing that he, too, was on a
quest that could mean life or death to Blake, nor that
she had found him at exactly the right moment. After
more than a decade of work, he was onto something that
would turn the world of Marfan syndrome upside down.
 |
 |
 |
|
| > Unburdened by scientific dogma, Dietz can see things others don’t. |
|
|
Harry “Hal” Dietz graduated
from Duke in 1980, from SUNY Upstate Medical School
in 1984 (as valedictorian of his class), then easily
made the jump to Johns Hopkins for four more years
as an intern and resident in pediatrics and critical
care medicine. For a bright young physician interested
in a career in academic medicine, the next step was
a postdoctoral fellowship. So in 1988, Dietz embarked
on a fellowship in pediatric cardiology.
Once he made that decision, it was inevitable he
would care for many people with Marfan syndrome.
While Marfan is a relatively rare disorder (1 in
5,000 worldwide), Johns Hopkins had been regarded as
an international center of excellence for its diagnosis
and treatment for half a century. University Professor
Victor McKusick first published on MFS in 1955, in
an article focusing on its cardiovascular aspects.
In 1956, he made Marfan syndrome what he calls “the
queen” of his landmark book, Heritable Disorders
of Connective Tissue, describing the condition as solely
due to weakness of a structural connective tissue protein.
That monograph essentially launched the field of medical
genetics—and attracted a continuing flow of Marfan
patients to Hopkins.
Connective tissue is found throughout the body. When
it malfunctions, no part of the body is safe. With
the benefit of more Marfan patient “material” than
at most centers, McKusick’s disciples attacked
the plethora of problems confronting their patients.
Adapting procedures developed for other conditions,
the team’s surgeons, led by Vincent Gott, used
Dacron grafts to bypass the ballooning aorta. Suddenly,
the imminent death sentence hanging over many Marfan
patients was gone. To replace stretched and leaky heart
valves, the surgeons first used mechanical valves and
then learned to repair their patients’ own valves.
Physicians on the team developed expertise in treating
problems particular to Marfan syndrome in the skeleton,
eyes, nervous system, skin and lungs. Many people
with MFS now live to age 70, but with frequent trips
throughout their life to the “repair shop.” Despite
these successes, the disorder’s genetic underpinnings
remained unknown.
Enter Dietz.
Until that point, the young physician had focused
on being a better clinician. “Research just wasn’t
how I focused my time,” he recalls. “In
clinical medicine, I felt a very personal connection
to each person I cared for.” In the late 1980s,
however, a pediatric cardiologist specializing in Marfan
could offer little more than palliative care, referrals
to good surgeons and a sympathetic ear. Frustrated,
Dietz realized he could help his patients more by going
into research.
“I can clearly remember the day in 1989 when
I entered the office of Haig Kazazian, then director
of the Center for Medical Genetics,” recalls
Dietz. “I asked if I could participate in a genetic
study aimed at elucidating the cause of Marfan syndrome.
Haig knew nothing about me, and I knew next to nothing
about molecular genetics. Nevertheless, within hours
Haig had assembled the team of individuals needed to
promote my interest and nurture my development as a
scientist.”
“We were going through a golden age in genetics
at Hopkins,” recalls Kazazian, who would later
head the Department of Genetics at the University of
Pennsylvania. A decade earlier, in 1978, Hopkins’ Dan
Nathans and Ham Smith had won the Nobel Prize for discovering
restriction enzymes, the biochemical scissors that
cut DNA at specific sequences so it could be analyzed.
As a result, says Kazazian, “in human genetics,
we had lots of different projects and great people
all thinking about basic mechanisms and opening entirely
new fields. Hal was so sharp he sought advice from
many people.”
Dietz went to work in the lab of medical geneticist
Clair Francomano, who quickly recognized that he has “absolutely
golden hands in the lab.”
Working 22-hour days, the newcomer to bench science
made breathtaking strides, publishing his first two
papers within two years. They were blockbusters. In
one, Dietz mapped Marfan to a specific chromosome,
chromosome 15. In the second, he identified mutations
in the gene for fibrillin-1, a connective tissue protein,
as diagnostic of Marfan syndrome. He had found the
Marfan gene!
“Not a bad start for a new investigator,” says
McKusick drily.
Dietz still recalls in vivid detail that “Eureka
moment” in the darkroom when he found the gene. “It
was 12 o’clock at night. I was feeling tired
and lonely. Then suddenly there’s this moment
of insight, this precious feeling that no one else
in history knew that piece of information that you
know at that moment. That makes all the rest worthwhile—and
there’s a lot of ‘all the rest.’”
Once the euphoria had passed, however, his mood changed. “It
was a time of great pessimism,” says Dietz, “because
we still didn’t know how to improve connective
tissue throughout the body. How could you give a person
something that’s missing in every tissue? It
was like a house built with a rotten frame. You can’t
imagine how to make the house better without tearing
it down and starting over.”
While connective tissue fell out of favor as an area
of focus for most scientists, Dietz continued to plug
away in the lab, making mouse models of Marfan and
identifying mutations. Finally, in 2000 came what he
calls “an even finer moment” than discovery
of the gene. “I walked into a patient’s
room, saw his long fingers and thought, ‘This
just doesn’t make sense.’ Why should weakness
of the tissues lead to overgrowth of the bone? You
couldn’t explain those fingers just with weakness
of the tissues.”
Obviously this wasn’t the first time Dietz
had observed long, spidery fingers in his patients.
But it was what he terms “an epiphany moment.” If
the defect in the fibrillin-1 gene couldn’t explain
all of his patients’ symptoms, then there had
to be a second pathway, completely unanticipated, that
was altered in the biological sequence leading to Marfan
syndrome. As a wise man once noted, “Discovery
consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and
thinking what no one else has thought.”
“Hal has more good ideas in a day than most
people have in a year,” says Hopkins pediatric
geneticist Ada Hamosh, who also happens to be Dietz’s
wife. “Because he’s not formally educated
in science, he’s not burdened by dogma. He’s
able to have any outrageous thought he wants. And like
a dog with a bone, he won’t let go ’til
he has the answer.”
In this case, Dietz’s unique blend of inspiration
and dogged persistence led to a growth factor dubbed
TGF-beta as the mysterious pathway.
Transforming growth factor-beta is a family of signaling
molecules that tell cells when to divide, where to
migrate, what proteins to make—and when to die.
Usually this occurs in an orderly, appropriate fashion.
But triggered by a genetic defect, TGF-ß may
give totally different directions to different cells—all
resulting in inappropriate behavior.
Dietz became suspicious when he realized that the
structure of a TGF-ß regulatory protein resembled
fibrillin-1, the Marfan gene—and that TGF-ß regulatory
proteins bind to fib-1. If a mutation in the
fib-1 gene causes a fibrillin-1 deficiency, he hypothesized,
it also might unleash too much TGF-ß activity,
triggering a whole cascade of inappropriate behavior.
In the lungs of patients with Marfan, TGF-ß might
tell cells to die inappropriately, preventing division
into alveoli, the small air-filled sacs necessary for
normal breathing.
In the aorta, it might tell cells to make enzymes
to break down tissues.
In muscles, it might suppress the ability of stem
cells to regenerate muscle. In bones, it might tell
cells to divide inappropriately. Too many cells, and
abnormal tissue might form—such as the overgrowth
of bone in the long fingers.
Block the TGF-ß pathway and cell behavior should
return to normal.
To prove his hypothesis, Dietz and his Hopkins lab
team—which by 2003 had grown to 16 scientists—injected
an antibody to TGF-ß into mice they had bred
to serve as a model of Marfan. And then they waited.
If they were correct, within two weeks they should
see impact on the lung.
When it was time to sacrifice the first mouse, a
general sense of excitement filled the lab. People
paused in their own work and clustered around the microscope
to view slides containing slices of its lung.
When Dietz entered the lab, removed his glasses and
peered through the scope, there was a sudden silence.
He smiles broadly when he recalls what he saw: normalized
lungs with clusters of small alveoli. Proof of principle! TGF-ß was
an idea with traction.
But they’d have to wait six long months to
observe any impact on the aorta—and as long as
15 months to see whether blocking TGF-ß blocked
its negative impact on muscle regeneration.
That’s where things stood when Anita Althaus
called Dietz’ office early in 2003. Told that
his next available appointment was in three months,
she burst into tears, and cried, “But my baby’s
dying, and he’s only 2 months old!”
Dietz’s assistant calmed Anita down and asked
how soon she could arrange to travel to Baltimore.
A few weeks later, Anita, Joe—and Blake—had
their first meeting with Hal Dietz. “Both Joe
and I instantly loved him,” says Anita, a warm
woman with a ready laugh. At 5-foot 5-inches, her soft
curves and outgoing personality are a contrast to the
more reserved 6-foot Joe, who bears a striking resemblance
to football player Peyton Manning. “[Dr. Dietz]
was what we needed as new parents of a child with Marfan,” remembers
Anita. “Unlike the geneticist back home, he assured
us ‘Blake’s not going to die of Marfan
syndrome.’”
Anita’s next question: “What can we do
for Blake today?”
What was available were a number of palliative procedures,
so Dietz arranged for consultations with a genetic
ophthalmologist and an orthopedic surgeon. But while
Anita focused on helping her son here and now, she
says, “Joe looked to the future. He asked, ‘What
new things are coming along?’”
Dietz’s response held out a glimmer of hope.
Something new was on the horizon, something that might
halt Blake’s progressively severe symptoms.
Six months later and six months after that, the entire
Althaus family returned to Baltimore. Anita’s
mom stayed in the hotel room with Blake’s older
sister, Jenna, and later also with the new baby of
the family, Chase, while Anita, Joe and Blake saw Dietz
and their team of Hopkins physicians. “For a
family of four or five to fly out every six months
is a financial burden,” Anita admits, “but
we would beg, borrow and steal to get to Johns Hopkins.”
Nor did she hesitate to battle insurance companies
that didn’t want to pay for Blake to go there. “I
told them that if I have to, I’ll go to every
news channel in Minneapolis.”
Each time they returned to Hopkins, Joe asked Dietz, “What’s
going on with that miracle drug you’re working
on?” Twice the response was, “It’s
not ready yet.”
Back in the lab, at the appointed time in maturation
of the Marfan mice they’d injected, Dietz and
his team had been analyzing each new set of tissues.
After the lungs, exults Dietz, “I recognized
the mice had normalized heart valves. And then that
the aortic aneurysm was completely blocked. This showed
that TGF-ß was not just a player, but the major
player!”
Proving that TGF-ß was what Dietz calls “the
culprit that caused cells to behave badly” gave
him immediate insight regarding a possible treatment
for patients: Inhibit TGF-ß and block the destructive
process. Frequent injection of a TGF-ß antibody
was not a practical solution, however. He needed a
safe medication that would have the same effect. For
humans, not mice, the answer was still “not ready
yet.”
 |
 |
 |
|
| > Anita
and Blake Althaus, at home in Minnesota. |
|
|
Then, amazingly, a literature search revealed that
in animal models of a few rare conditions, a drug called
losartan inhibited TGF-ß. Losartan was hardly
a new drug. Marketed by Merck for several decades as
Cozaar, it was best known for lowering blood pressure
by blocking an angiotensin receptor. And it was safe.
It was even approved by the FDA for treating high blood
pressure in children as young as 6.
To validate his theory of the link between the signaling
molecule and Marfan—and to prove that losartan
could break that link—Dietz and his team designed
a classic comparative study in Marfan mice and focused
their attention on the aorta.
When the mice were 7 weeks old, and their aortas
already had begun to change, the researchers began
adding losartan to the drinking water for 15 of them. Fifteen
more were injected with placebos. A final 15 received
a beta-blocker, propranolol (a drug that’s been
a standard of care for Marfan patients; by lowering
blood pressure, it reduces stress on the artery, even
though it does nothing to correct the underlying defect).
Six months later came the moment of truth. When Dietz
checked tissue from each group of mice, he found that
those in the losartan group appeared indistinguishable
from normal mice. Their aortas no longer showed any
damage. None. The earlier damage literally had disappeared,
while the aortic damage in the mice receiving placebos
or beta-blockers had grown worse.
“It was truly a jaw-dropping moment,” Dietz
told Science magazine’s reporter, throwing his
usual reserve to the winds. “It was beyond anything
I could have anticipated or hoped.” Now
he had proof a drug already approved by the FDA might
hold the answer to the “rotten frame” ravaging
the bodies of Marfan patients.
Anita and Joe Althaus were panicking. Blake had an
echocardiogram every three months, and each time the
test showed that the baby’s aortic root—the
spot where his main artery exited his heart—was
dilating more and more. He would need heart surgery
sooner rather than later. And because his body wasn’t
big enough for a graft that would take him through
growth, he was destined to have subsequent surgery
down the road to put in a bigger tube to accommodate
his blood flow.
Finally, when Blake was almost 2, Dietz gave the
worried parents the news they were waiting to hear:
He was ready to try his new drug on Blake—if
they were ready.
Hal Dietz has a perfectly cool demeanor, yet admits
that “anxiety” is his “connective
tissue.” He recalls long discussions with
Anita and Joe about what was known, and not known,
about losartan. “When Dr. Dietz finally said
Blake could go on the medicine, he said we should go
home and think about it,” says Joe. “We
said, ‘We’ve been thinking about it for
two years. We’re ready!’”
Anita triumphantly recounts what happened next: “Our
cardiologist was skeptical. He said, ‘It’s
been on the market for 25 years; my mother’s
on it!’ But at Blake’s first check-up after
starting on the medicine, for the first time there
was no growth in the aortic root. Our cardiologist
thought it was just a fluke. When there was no growth
in the aortic root at the second check-up, he said, ‘It
still doesn’t make me a believer.’ Three
months later, he said: ‘I’m absolutely
sold.’”
Losartan did more than stop Blake’s aortic
root growth. It also increased his appetite. According
to Anita, “He’s gained some serious weight.
Now he looks like a normal little boy who is tall and
thin.”
Photos of Blake taken before he started on losartan,
then six months and a year later provide graphic proof
that he didn’t just put on weight, but gained
muscle mass and strength. In the first shot, slumped
in a chair, pale, blonde and blue-eyed Blake looks
like Antoine de St. Exupéry’s fragile
Little Prince. By the second, his little muscles are
bulging as he totes a heavy, water-filled bucket on
the beach. By the third picture, he’s mugging
it up for the camera as a muscle man.
Losartan hasn’t cured all of Blake’s
problems, however. The medicine has helped some with
the elasticity in his stretched tissues and floppy
joints but not in time to prevent the twisted vertebrae
from touching his spinal cord. Two complicated surgeries
were required to correct that condition. Fortunately,
they could take place close to home, at Gillette Children’s
Hospital in St. Paul, after consultations between pediatric
orthopedic surgeons there and at Hopkins. With Blake’s
next surgery, two sets of rods will be inserted to
keep his spine straight. They’ll need to
be adjusted every six months until he’s 15 or
older, when he’ll be ready for a spinal fusion.
To prevent scoliosis—curvature of the spine—until
then he’ll also need to wear a firm plastic brace
that goes from under his arms to his hips.
 |
 |
 |
|
| >
The Althaus tribe: Joe and Anita, with Blake, Jenna, and little Chase. Now nearly 5, Blake enjoyed a summer of catching tadpoles and collecting rocks. |
|
|
Some maturation also is required before his vision
is corrected. At first, Blake was extremely near-sighted.
Now his lenses are loose and floating, so he’s
both near and far-sighted. In any case, losartan should
prevent the glaucoma, cataracts and retinal tears that
used to plague those born with MFS. And one scientist
in the Dietz lab now is looking specifically at the
role of TGF-ß in eye tissues.
Now 4, Blake started preschool last year. His mother
reports that he likes it a lot, despite his problems.
He can’t climb on the jungle gym, and because
of poor vision from the dislocated lenses, needs help
so he won’t trip. His teachers watch him to try
to prevent falls, says Anita, and “when he goes
potty, he needs help getting his pants down because
of the brace.”
Anita explained Marfan syndrome to the parents of
Blake’s classmates, but she also told them “otherwise,
Blake’s just like any other kid. He likes to
play cards, go to birthday parties and go fishing with
his dad.”
Highly verbal since he was 1, Blake’s also
pretty good at standing up for himself. When kids ask
him to wrestle, he says, “I can’t because
I have Marfan.” When he’s fed up with wearing
the brace, he tells Anita, “A guy needs a day
off.” And sometimes she agrees. He knows why
he’s so tall, and when he sees someone else who
seems exceptionally tall, asks, “Does he have
Marfan?” Sometimes, says Anita, “we’re
thinking the same thing.”
Not surprisingly in a family that’s contended
with the syndrome for almost five years, Jenna, now
6, insisted for a long time that her doll had Marfan.
Blake Althaus was not alone in receiving “off-label” losartan.
Dietz also prescribed the drug for 15 other young patients
with rapidly expanding aortic roots. He has carefully
monitored their progress and expects to publish a paper
on this early clinical experience. The results to date: “Very
clear evidence that losartan protects the aorta.”
Off-label use is not good enough over the long run,
however. To prove beyond a doubt that losartan should
be the new standard of care, Dietz organized a true
double-blind study with a co-principal investigator
at Harvard and with the Pediatric Heart Network (seven
medical centers brought together by the National Institutes
of Health to study problems in children with heart
disease). To enroll participants quickly, 10
other centers with large Marfan pediatric clinics are
participating in the losartan trial, which launched
early in 2007.
The study will follow 600 patients, ages 6 months
to 25, over three years. Half will receive losartan
and half atenalol. At three interim points during the
study, scientists on its Data Monitoring Safety Board
will look at results. If there is unequivocal evidence
that losartan is better at stopping the aorta’s
growth, the trial will be cut short, and everyone will
be started on the drug.
While the core trial is only studying the effect
of losartan vs. atenolol on aortic aneurysm, efforts
are under way to find funding for trials that can study
losartan’s possible effects on other body systems,
including lungs, bones, muscles and eyes—in the
same people who participate in the core trial. Thanks
to an initial gift to the National Marfan Foundation,
studies of muscle and of biomechanical aspects of the
aorta are proceeding.
Excitement in the Marfan community at losartan’s
potential to block symptoms is gut-based, personal,
emotional. As the president of the foundation
told a reporter, “This breakthrough is so full
of promise that people have chills.”
So will children like Blake now be cured and grow
up free from risk of early death?
“We haven’t eliminated the disease,” says
Dietz, who today directs the efforts of 20 researchers
through Hopkins’ William S. Smilow Center for
Marfan Syndrome Research. He notes that the same question
probably came to mind when aortic surgery for Marfan
was first developed. “It allowed most people
to live a normal life span simply by changing the natural
history of the disease, but it hadn’t eliminated
it,” he says, noting that some patients require
additional surgery to correct dissection of the descending
aorta. And some die of an aneurysm, though at an older
age than they would have previously.
“It’s possible,” he says, “that
losartan won’t eliminate Marfan syndrome but
will get us to that next step in changing the natural
history of the disease.”
Dietz is less sanguine, however, about losartan’s
ability to prevent sudden death from a ruptured aorta. “In
retrospect, most of those who died suddenly had all
the markers and should have been recognized. You can’t
wait until someone dies in the family to start thinking ‘Could
it be Marfan syndrome?’ Primary care practitioners
must recognize this condition in order to diagnose
and treat it.”
His advice to these doctors is clear-cut: “Pay
attention to certain patterns of skeletal abnormality.
Watch for individuals who are not just tall but extremely
tall for their family, or have legs much too long for
their body. Look for chest wall deformity and curvature
of the spine. Most often it’s the skeleton that
tips people off,” he explains. “Once you
know what to look for, it will become obvious that
certain people need further evaluation.”
At the beach, Dietz’s 10-year-old daughter,
Nina, like Blake and Jenna
Althaus, has developed a clinician’s eye for
picking out people with Marfan and pointing them out
to her father. Hal
Dietz admits that sometimes he can’t resist
going up to perfect strangers on the beach to tell
them, “I treat people who look like you and have
a treatable condition.” He adds, “I emphasize
the ‘treatable’ and suggest they see their
doctor. Usually people are receptive. Sometimes
they’re hostile and say, ‘I know. I’m
on vacation to forget my troubles. Leave me alone!’”
Blake Althaus probably will need to stay on losartan
for life. “Each morning,” says his
mom, “I lay out his medicine with a cup of milk,
and he takes his own meds. He’s an old soul.
It’s hard to believe he’s just 4. He’s
been through a lot and takes it like a champ.”
Living on a cul-de-sac with 17 children, the Althaus
offspring are outside from sunup until sundown every
summer day. Playing in the backyard sandbox,
catching tadpoles in the neighborhood brook, collecting
rocks, Blake is one of the gang—but with an adult
always hovering nearby to catch him if he trips.
From the kitchen, Anita can watch Blake riding his
Big Wheel outside on the patio, the limits of his permitted
bike universe. Trying to cut the apron strings,
Blake tells her, “I’m fine. Just let me
do this!”
Blake’s 5th birthday is approaching in November.
His aortic root hasn’t grown in three years.
At birth, it was the size of a 45-pound child’s. “Now
it’s more normal, not so much of a worry,” says
Anita. ”We don’t think about the
heart all the time. I just realized, ‘Oh my gosh,
it’s been four months since we had an echocardiogram.’”
The leak in Blake’s heart valve also is resolving,
Anita reports. “It went from moderate to mild
to now it’s barely there.” As far as she’s
concerned, “Blake’s silver bullet really
is a miracle drug.” 
Beyond Marfan: Losartan’s Promise
Discovering that TGF-ß is the critical
pathway in Marfan could lead to breakthroughs
in the treatment of other conditions. The picture
that’s emerging, says Hal Dietz, “is
that many forms of vascular disease,” including
aortic aneurysms, “are caused by too much
TGF-ß signaling.”
Dietz and his protégés are particularly
excited about losartan’s potential to treat
muscular dystrophy (MD). In Duchenne muscular
dystrophy, the most common form, as in Marfan
syndrome, muscle weakness is due to the inability
of stem cells in the muscle to repair damaged
muscle cells. TGF-ß turns out to be the
culprit in blocking muscle cells’ normal
regenerative ability. The Dietz team proved this
in a mouse model, then used losartan to block
the TGF-ß signal, clearly correcting the
malfunction. They published their results in
January 2007 in Nature Medicine.
While losartan doesn’t prevent muscle
destruction, it facilitates regeneration of new
muscle cells. For MD patients, this could slow
progression of the disease and improve muscle
performance and breathing—without pernicious
steroids. To test this possibility, Ronald Cohn—who
now has funding to establish his own lab—is
planning a clinical trial with the Muscular Dystrophy
Association.
Dietz’s collaborators also are pursuing
other leads for losartan. One postdoc is looking
at a geriatric population: What’s the difference
in body mass of individuals who took losartan
for hypertension vs. those prescribed a beta
blocker? Another is looking at rare genetic models
of premature aging. Still another is focusing
on muscle weakness in patients on chemotherapy.
Losartan might have a role there, too.
Elaine Freeman |
Elaine Freeman retired as Johns
Hopkins Medicine’s vice president for corporate
communications in 2006 and after a quarter century
finally has the time to return to her roots as a
writer.
|