Interpretation of PFGE Results
The banding pattern in each lane is compared visually to that in every other lane. Computer software may be used to assist in lane-to-lane and gel-to-gel comparisons. For band size determinations and lane comparisons a molecular weight marker is included on each end of the gel. Band differences are interpreted according to the following table taken from the consensus paper for PFGE interpretation in outbreak settings authored by Tenover, et al. in J. of Clin. Micro. 1995;33:2233-2239.
No. Band Differences | No. Genetic Differences | Interpretation | Epidemiologic Significance |
0 | 0 | Indistinguishable | Isolates are same strain type. |
1-3 | 1 | Closely Related | Isolates are probably related. |
4-6 | 2 | Possibly Related | Isolates are possibly related. |
=>7 | =>3 | Different | Isolates are different |
Isolates which are the same strain type (no band differences) are given a common strain letter or number i.e strain JHH-A. Closely related isolates will have from one to three bands different from one another. Closely related isolates are considered subtypes of one another and designated with the same letter, but with a different subtype number. For example: JHH-A1, JHH-A2, etc. An isolate which differs by more than 3 bands is given a new letter to denote its strain type i.e. JHH-B, JHH-C, etc.
Every isolate on each gel is interpreted according to these guidelines. Control isolates should be a different strain type than the outbreak strain. A type-written report is generated which includes a description of isolates, the epidemiologic question or reason or testing, the gel image and an interpretation. See Sample Report.