General Principles:
A. What constitutes an exposure?
1. Exposures known to pose a risk of transmission for bloodborne pathogens:
Percutaneous injury (hollow needle> solid sharp)
Splash on mucous membrane
Splash on non-intact skin
NOTE: The risk of transmission increases with larger volumes of fluid and more severe injuries.
2. Body fluids known to be infectious:
3. Body fluids presumed to be infectious:
CSF
Pleural fluid
Pericardial fluid
Peritoneal fluid
Amniotic fluid
Joint fluid
4. Body fluids known NOT to be infectious (if not visibly bloody):
Tears
Saliva
Urine
Feces
Sweat
Emesis
B. What are the initial steps in exposure management?
No matter what the health care worker has been exposed to, IMMEDIATE cleaning of the exposure site should also be the 1st priority.
Skin wounds should be cleaned with soap and water - there is no evidence that antiseptics are better than soap and caustic agents (bleach) may do more harm than good.
Mucous membranes should be flushed thoroughly with water
Eyes should be irrigated with a liter of normal saline.
The health care worker (HCW) should be given a tetanus shot if one has not been given in the last 10 years.
Even if the exposure poses no risk of Hepatitis B infection it is a good opportunity to make sure the exposed HCW has completed the Hep B vaccine series.
Management of exposures to specific pathogens
Hepatitis C
Risk of conversion
Post exposure recommendations
The site should be cleaned immediately
No medications are indicated
Immune globulin and alpha interferon are not recommended
Post exposure follow up
- Average interval between exposure and seroconversion is 8-10 weeks
- EIA is falsely positive in up to 30% of health care workers and falsely negative in 5%
- RNA testing (PCR) may catch infections earlier but detection is highly variable
- Health care workers should have baseline and follow-up EIA tests with PCR confirmation of positive results
- Liver enzymes should also be monitored at regular intervals
- The CDC does not recommend changes in breast feeding or sexual practices in HCW who have suffered a Hep C exposure.
Hepatitis B
Risk of conversion
The most infectious of all bloodborne pathogens but represents almost no risk to health care workers who have been successfully vaccinated.
Risk of transmission is up to 30-40% for susceptible persons exposed to patients who are "e" antigen positive
- Risk of transmission from mucous membrane exposures is less well defined but also felt to be quite high
Post exposure recommendations
The site should be cleaned immediately
Further recommendations depend on both the vaccine status of the exposed health care worker and the Hep B status of the patient
Following an exposure, the HCW should be tested for sAb. If the sAb titer in the HCW is >10 IU/L then the HCW is considered protected from Hep B.
1. HCW never vaccinated
Then: the HCW should also receive hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) .06ml/kg ASAP and absolutely within 7 days of exposure
Then: HCW should receive vaccine alone
2. HCW vaccinated (one or more doses)
If: the HCW has, or has ever had, adequate anitbody (.10 IU/l) (Ab).
Then: no additional treatment
If: HCW has inadequate Ab AND the source is HBsAg negative OR low risk
Then: HCW should receive a booster dose of vaccine
If: HCW has inadequate Ab AND the source is HBsAg positive OR high risk
Then: HCW should receive HBIG AND and a booster dose of vaccine
Post exposure follow up
Hepatitis B sAg is the diagnostic test of choice
HBsAg should appear within 6 weeks of exposure
Liver enzymes should be monitored regularly
The CDC does not recommend changes in breast feeding or sexual practices for HCW who have suffered and occupational exposure to Hep B.
HIV
Risk of conversion
Post exposure recommendations - Overview
If post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is to be given they should be given within 2 hours of the exposure to have optimal effect
AZT is the only drug that has been studied
CDC recommends adding 3TC to AZT because it is non-toxic and may slow the development of AZT resistant virus
Protease inhibitors (PIs) are recommended only for more serious exposures or when there has been a delay in treatment
Nelfinavir and Indinavir are the recommended PIs
Exposures involving patients with resistant virus are becoming increasingly common
If possible, PEP is modified to account for the source patient's retro-viral experience and should include two drugs the patient has never taken
Rapid HIV tests (SUDS) can be helpful in post exposure counseling
The rapid test is an EIA that is >99.9% sensitive
HIV RNA testing may be indicated when source is thought to be in the "window" period (e.g. acute conversion)
Post exposure recommendations - Specifics
The site should be cleaned immediately
Determine the extent of the exposure or "Exposure code"
Determine the HIV status or risks of the source or "Source code"
Exposure codes (EC)
- Exposure to non-infectious fluids:
EC=0
- Exposure involving mucous membrane, non-intact skin or prolonged contact with intact skin:
Small volume EC=1
Large volume EC=2
- Percutaneous injury:
Less severe (solid needle, minor wound) EC=2
More severe (hollow needle, major wound, bloody device) EC=3
Exposure Codes
- Source patient known HIV negative: SC=0
- Source patient HIV positive with low viral load: SC=1
- Source patient HIV positive with high viral load: SC=2
PEP Recommendations
Exposure code (EC) | Source Code (SC) | Recommendation |
2 | 1 | No evidence that exposure carries increased risk BUT PEP considered standard of care. Recommend basic 2 drug regimen (AZT/3TC) |
2 | 2 | Exposure carries increased risk. Recommend expanded 3-drug regimen with PI. |
3 | 1 or 2 | Exposure carries increased risk. Recommend expanded 3-drug regimen with PI. |
1-3 | Unknown | PEP of unclear benefit. Recommendation should depend on severity of exposure and setting (e.g. HIV clinic |