<< HOME
 Mission | Locations | Contact Us 

APPLICATION
Protocol Review

Overview

The GCRC is required by NIH to have a GCRC Advisory Committee (GAC) that must review and approve all research protocols before they use GCRC funds. Our GAC is chaired by Daniel E. Ford, M.D., M.P.H., Vice Dean for Clinical Investigation and appointed by the dean’s office.   Because our GCRC averages 18 protocol reviews per month, the GAC consists of three Protocol Review Subcommittees (PRS).

These subcommittees do the in-depth reviews, communicate with investigators, and give final approval on behalf of the full GAC committee. Protocols conducted primarily in the pediatric population are reviewed by the Pediatric Protocol Review Sub-committee (Peds PRS), chaired by Beth Laube, Ph.D..  Protocols conducted primarily in the adult population are reviewed by the Adult Protocol Review Sub-committee (Adult PRS), chaired by Simeon Margolis, M.D., Ph.D..   Protocols requiring the expertise of the Neuro Behavioral Research Unit at the Kennedy Krieger Institute are reviewed by the Neuro Behavioral Research Unit Protocol Review Subcommittee (NBRU PRS), chaired by Dr. Michael Johnston, M.D..

The purpose of the PRS is to provide a review that considers the rigor of the science, analytic plan, inclusion of women, minorities, and children, resources required, and logistics of GCRC use. Human subjects’ issues and funding classification (A, B, D) are also considered.

Steps in the Review Process:

1.       Application is submitted to the GCRC prior to the deadline and assigned to the appropriate PRS.

2.       Application is placed on the agenda for the next PRS meeting and primary, secondary, biostatistical, and human subjects reviewers are assigned.

3.       Application is discussed at the PRS meeting, culminating in a vote.

4.       Committee chair sends letter to the investigator informing of the committee’s decision, and including any relevant comments.

Possible Outcomes of Committee Vote

Approval:

When a protocol is approved by the PRS, it is fully approved on behalf of the entire GCRC Advisory Committee.  Members of the PRS also serve on the GAC.

Deferral:

Those applications deferred by the PRS are reconsidered after the investigator responds to the committee’s comments. Safety issues, concerns regarding the study design, lack of an analytic plan, or significant human subjects’ issues would typically cause a protocol approval to be deferred. A deferral letter including relevant comments will be sent to the investigator. If the PRS is not satisfied with the response and votes to defer again, the PI is usually invited to attend the next PRS meeting.

Administrative Deferral: 

 Administrative Deferral is used when a protocol requires some relatively minor clarifications or responses, but does not need to be re-reviewed by the full committee. A deferral letter including relevant comments will be sent to the investigator. Once a satisfactory response is received, full approval is granted.

Common reasons for Administrative Deferral

- lack of IRB approval

- conflicts between consent form and study protocol

- incorrect Targeted/Planned Enrollment Table

- lack of acceptable Inclusion of Children statement

- questions raised that do not require further discussion by the PRS

- “other sources of funding” budgets not provided

- appearance of conflicts in funding

- unsettled budget issues

- In some cases, the reviewers, as well as the chair, will review the response prior to approval. However, the protocol does not go back to the PRS for further review unless the response raises some strong concerns that were not previously apparent.

Disapprove: Those applications that are disapproved are not reconsidered by the PRS unless they are resubmitted with major revisions. Typically, a protocol is disapproved because the committee feels there are serious design flaws or insufficient material to judge the protocol fairly.

Once a study is fully approved an approval letter from the GAC chair will be forwarded to the principal investigator.  To check on study approval status, contact Shernice Madison, Assistant Administrative Manager, 4-2717, or Gerald Stacy, Administrative Manager & GAC Secretary, 4-2717. 

 


Johns Hopkins Medicine