|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| By Design? I was very interested in the article about Louise Cavagnaro and the
history of racial segration at Hopkins (“The
Way We Were,” September). I was a bit flabbergasted by the
sentence, “This [segregation at Hopkins] was in no way by design
or the result of any articulated institutional policy.” This came
after a sentence that said “...many facilities were separate—some
for “colored,” others for “white.” How separate
restrooms and water fountains with signage to that effect could be done
without design or intent escapes me. It was by design. Saying otherwise
falsely absolves the institution of its responsibility to lead rather
than just follow popular prejudices. We need to face our history honestly
and move ahead. Ed.’s Note: We hope the range of other articles highlighting diversity throughout the institution in the last issue of Dome illustrates the many ways in which Hopkins has indeed moved on and now is trying to take a leadership position. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|